ReviewJournal of bone oncology2025
Soft tissue recurrence in giant cell tumor of Bone: A comprehensive review of pathogenesis, imaging features, and clinical management.
Review in Journal of bone oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Giant Cell Tumor of the Sacrum: A Narrative Review of Management Challenges and Modalities.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a benign but locally aggressive neoplasm with a high risk of recurrence. Among its patterns of relapse, soft-tissue recurrence (STR) is an uncommon but clinically significant entity, often presenting as ossified or non-ossified perilesional nodules. Despite its rarity, STR poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges that require clarification. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was performed across PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar from 1980 through January 2025, focusing on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, imaging features, histopathology, management, and outcomes of STR in GCTB. Case reports, series, and retrospective studies explicitly distinguishing STR from intraosseous recurrence were included, and findings were synthesized narratively. Results: STR occurs in approximately 2-3 % of GCTB cases, typically within 6-12 months after surgery. Major risk factors include curettage procedures, pathological fractures, cortical breaches, and unrecognized microscopic soft-tissue extension. Imaging reveals three distinct patterns: peripheral "eggshell" ossification, central nodular calcification, and purely soft-tissue lesions. Histology mirrors primary GCTB, often with osteogenic metaplasia, while molecular testing confirms retention of H3F3A mutations. Surgical excision with clear margins remains the mainstay of treatment, yielding excellent functional outcomes. However, up to 60 % of patients experience multiple recurrences, highlighting the need for vigilant surveillance. Systemic agents such as denosumab or bisphosphonates remain investigational, and radiotherapy is generally contraindicated due to malignant transformation risk. Conclusion: STR represents a rare but distinct subset of GCTB recurrences. Awareness of risk factors, early imaging-based detection, and complete surgical excision are critical for optimal outcomes. Further multicenter studies are required to define surveillance protocols, validate molecular predictors, and clarify the role of systemic therapy in this challenging condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.