ArticleTobacco induced diseases2025
Content analysis of media coverage on smoke-free policy implementation in ten low- and middle-income countries.
Article in Tobacco induced diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLow- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face a disproportionate exposure and disease burden from secondhand smoke (SHS). Creating completely smoke-free indoor public places is effective in protecting people from SHS. This study examines how online news outlets in LMICs discuss existing smoke-free policies and their implementation.
methodsIn September 2023, we used Tobacco Watcher (www.tobaccowatcher.org), a tobacco news surveillance platform, to identify articles using the built-in topic 'Air' (i.e. smoke-free policy) and search terms 'implementation' or 'compliance' in 10 LMICs from 2022 to 2023. Two trained coders independently assessed all articles for their relevance (either substantially discussing in multiple paragraphs or holding a clear position on smoke-free policy implementation). A content analysis was conducted, with the coders independently coding each article for argument position, content, evaluation of current implementation efforts, and argument presenters until reaching 80% agreement or higher. Discrepancies in coding were resolved through discussion.
resultsAmong 634 articles retrieved, 345 met the inclusion criteria. Most of these articles (81%, n=276) supported implementation of existing smoke-free policies; 31% (n=107) considered current smoke-free policy implementation efforts unsuccessful, citing lack of enforcement, signage, and other violations, while 20% (n=70) considered implementation to be successful; 21% (n=74) suggested a need for stronger smoke-free policies, including the elimination of designated smoking areas. Common argument presenters included government agencies (84%, n=291), civil society organizations (e.g. civil society: 40%, n=139), WHO (19%, n=67), and researchers or experts (18%, n=62).
conclusionsDiscourse around smoke-free policy implementation in online news media of LMICs was generally supportive, praising complete bans and active implementation. However, coverage highlights that enforcement remained a challenge and pointed to a need for stronger policies. News media can be utilized as avenues for raising awareness surrounding tobacco control challenges, building support for policy, and countering tobacco industry narratives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.