ArticleOncology reviews2025
Comparison of thulium laser
Article in Oncology reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable machine learning model predicts the early gastrointestinal dysfunction risk in severely burned patients: a multicenter-based study.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Defining the learning curve for thulium LaserFrontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To Compare the effects between thulium laser Methods: Between January 2022 and December 2024, we retrospectively collected the demographic and clinical data for patients with bladder cancer. A total of 79 patients in the conventional TURBT group and 58 patients in the thulium laser ERBT group completed the study. Both demographic and outcome variables were recorded; and we compared the incidence and severity of CRBD at 1, 6 and 24 h postoperatively, score of postoperative pain at 1, 6 and 24 h and patient satisfaction at 24 h following the surgery. Results: There were no significant differences in age, gender proportion, tumor multiplicity, tumor size and location, and duration of surgery between the two groups ( Conclusion: The results suggest that compared to conventional TURBT, thulium laser ERBT significantly reduce CRBD incidence and severity, lower postoperative pain, and improve postoperative patient satisfaction. However, as a single-center retrospective study, these findings require further validation by large-scale, prospective, multicenter trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.