ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
A machine learning-based predictive nomogram for early neurological improvement after thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a simple clinical score to predict early neurological improvement after mechanical thrombectomy: a single-centre cohort study.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Predicting early neurological deterioration in acute branch atheromatous disease without reperfusion therapy: a machine learning model.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early neurological improvement (ENI) is a critical prognostic indicator for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients undergoing intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA). This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning (ML)-based model for predicting ENI using clinical and biochemical data. Methods: Clinical data from 217 AIS patients (97 ENI, 120 non-ENI) were retrospectively analyzed. Significant baseline differences were identified between groups, including hemorrhage, onset-to-needle time (ONT), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), weight, and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). Four ML algorithms, including Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and XGBoost, were implemented. Model performance was evaluated via area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Key predictors were identified by intersecting top-ranked features from all algorithms, followed by logistic regression modeling and nomogram visualization. Results: The MLP model achieved the highest AUC (0.77) in the testing set, outperforming RF (0.72), SVM (0.63), and XGBoost (0.68). Six overlapping parameters, including APTT, ALT/AST ratio, ONT, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), weight, and NLR, were selected as core predictors. The logistic regression model incorporating these parameters yielded an AUC of 0.74, while the nomogram demonstrated that the predictive model exhibited strong discriminative ability (C-index: 0.817) for predicting ENI in rt-PA-treated AIS patients. Conclusion: This ML-based model effectively predicts ENI in rt-PA-treated AIS patients by integrating critical clinical and biochemical markers. Its application may optimize personalized treatment strategies, enhance clinical decision-making, and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.