Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41312327›Full record

ArticleSkin health and disease2025

Lichen sclerosus in paediatric patients with phimosis undergoing circumcision.

Nada Aboukhatwah, Sandra Jerkovic Gulin, Christopher B Bunker, Michalis Varnavas, Georgios Kravvas

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin health and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nada AboukhatwahDepartment of Dermatology, Whittington Health NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4744-4978
Sandra Jerkovic GulinDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden.
Christopher B BunkerDepartment of Dermatology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Michalis VarnavasDepartment of Urology, Whittington Health NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Georgios KravvasDepartment of Dermatology, Whittington Health NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Male genital lichen sclerosus is a relatively uncommon but increasingly recognized cause of phimosis in paediatric patients. Objectives: To investigate the presence of male genital lichen sclerosus (MGLS) in paediatric patients presenting with phimosis and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of clinical assessment compared with histopathological findings. Methods: We conducted a single-centre, retrospective study of 48 paediatric circumcisions performed for phimosis over an 18-month period. Clinical diagnoses of phimosis were categorized as physiological or pathological and compared with postoperative histopathological findings. To quantify diagnostic reliability, percentage agreement and Cohen's kappa coefficient were used. Results: MGLS was confirmed histologically in 71% of patients, with the highest proportion occurring in boys aged 9-11 years. Among those clinically diagnosed with physiological phimosis, 70% showed histological evidence of MGLS, of whom 48% exhibited extensive disease. The overall concordance between clinical and histological diagnoses was 43.75%, with a Kappa value of 0.027, indicating only slight agreement. Conclusions: Currently, clinical assessments seem to underestimate the proportion of cases with MGLS, especially among younger boys. Enhancing awareness and recognition of this condition is essential to facilitate accurate and timely diagnosis, and to guide appropriate interventions, thereby preventing disease progression and reducing associated morbidity.

Identifiers

PMID41312327
PMCPMC12648523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.