Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41312322›Full record

ArticleSkin health and disease2025

National clinical reaudit on managing adults with bullous pemphigoid 2024 highlighting shifting clinical practices.

Ravi Ramessur, Hayley Smith, Zoe C Venables, Tanya Tumbeva, M Firouz Mohd Mustapa, David A R de Berker, British Association of Dermatologists’ Clinical Standards Unit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin health and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ravi RamessurSt John's Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4599-9455
Hayley SmithDepartment of Dermatology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Zoe C VenablesDepartment of Dermatology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK.
Tanya TumbevaClinical Standards Unit, British Association of Dermatologists, London, UK.
M Firouz Mohd MustapaClinical Standards Unit, British Association of Dermatologists, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4070-0696
David A R de BerkerDepartment of Dermatology, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK.
British Association of Dermatologists’ Clinical Standards Unit

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a chronic, autoimmune, blistering disorder that predominantly affects older adults and is associated with significant morbidity and treatment challenges. The British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) clinical guideline for managing people with BP was published in 2012; a national clinical audit was undertaken in 2018. This 2024 reaudit evaluates changes in clinical practice, including diagnostic methods, treatment strategies and documentation standards. Objectives: To reassess compliance with BAD audit standards, compare findings with the 2018 audit and identify trends in BP management. Methods: Over 9 weeks in 2024, BAD members submitted data for 450 cases of BP from 77 centres across the UK. Audit standards included documentation of comorbidities, osteoporosis risk management, patient satisfaction and systemic treatment monitoring. Results: The reaudit identified a shift in diagnostic practices, an increased proportion of severe baseline disease and continued gaps in -osteoporosis risk documentation. The use of doxycycline as a primary treatment has increased significantly since 2018. Conclusions: The findings highlight both progress and persistent challenges in BP management. Improved documentation and greater adherence to osteoporosis management guidelines remain priorities for future practice.

Identifiers

PMID41312322
PMCPMC12648533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.