ArticleSkin health and disease2025
National clinical reaudit on managing adults with bullous pemphigoid 2024 highlighting shifting clinical practices.
Article in Skin health and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a chronic, autoimmune, blistering disorder that predominantly affects older adults and is associated with significant morbidity and treatment challenges. The British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) clinical guideline for managing people with BP was published in 2012; a national clinical audit was undertaken in 2018. This 2024 reaudit evaluates changes in clinical practice, including diagnostic methods, treatment strategies and documentation standards. Objectives: To reassess compliance with BAD audit standards, compare findings with the 2018 audit and identify trends in BP management. Methods: Over 9 weeks in 2024, BAD members submitted data for 450 cases of BP from 77 centres across the UK. Audit standards included documentation of comorbidities, osteoporosis risk management, patient satisfaction and systemic treatment monitoring. Results: The reaudit identified a shift in diagnostic practices, an increased proportion of severe baseline disease and continued gaps in -osteoporosis risk documentation. The use of doxycycline as a primary treatment has increased significantly since 2018. Conclusions: The findings highlight both progress and persistent challenges in BP management. Improved documentation and greater adherence to osteoporosis management guidelines remain priorities for future practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.