Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41312280›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Performing wellness, concealing pain: a gendered continuum of challenges for women with lupus in the workplace.

Armand Bam, Joy Lulema

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Armand BamStellenbosch Business School, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Joy LulemaFaculty of Economic and Management Sciences, Stellenbosch Business School, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) work under conditions where success is often contingent on concealing pain, managing disclosure, and "performing" wellness in organisational cultures that reward composure over care. Workplaces are not neutral spaces; they are structured by ableist and gendered norms that privilege stability, productivity, and visibility, making episodic illness particularly disruptive. Methods: This study draws on a narrative inquiry approach with eight professional women living with SLE. Participants were invited to recount their embodied experiences of illness, identity, credibility, and inclusion in the workplace. The narratives were analysed thematically with a feminist disability lens, attentive to the relational and institutional contexts that shape meaning-making. Results: The findings introduce the Continuum of Embodied Challenges, a conceptual framework tracing the layered tensions participants face in navigating illness and institutional expectations. Diagnosis emerges as both a clinical and epistemic struggle, where uncertainty erodes trust in one's body. Participants described resisting the category of "disability" even when functionally impaired, and shouldering significant emotional and physical labour to remain credible in spaces that privilege predictability and presence. Discussion: By centring invisibility, gender, and resistance, this study advances feminist disability perspectives on chronic illness and work. It highlights how episodic disablement is structurally misrecognised in organisations designed around uninterrupted performance. The study argues for institutional models of inclusion that account for bodily unpredictability, fluctuating capacity, and the complexity of living and working with episodic illness.

Indexed as

disclosureembodimentepisodic illnessfeminist disability theoryinvisible disabilityprofessional identitysystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)workplace inclusion

Identifiers

PMID41312280
PMCPMC12646878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.