Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41312266›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025

Understanding shame, guilt, embarrassment and pride: a systematic review of self-conscious emotions.

Diksha Singh, Braj Bhushan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Diksha SinghIndian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India.
Braj BhushanIndian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-conscious emotions play a crucial role in social functioning, moral behavior, and identity formation. Their inherent complexity, necessitating self-awareness and social evaluation, presents significant challenges for empirical research. This systematic review identifies methodological issues and gaps in experimental research related to the affective traits (valence and arousal), physiological and neural correlates, nonverbal cues, and cross-cultural variations of self-conscious emotions. A comprehensive search was conducted for peer-reviewed empirical studies published between 2000 and 2024 across databases such as PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science, adhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Inclusion criteria focused on studies examining self-conscious emotions through physiological, neurological, behavioral, or cross-cultural approaches. A total of twenty-three studies were included, revealing variability in the valence and arousal profiles of self-conscious emotions, with distinct physiological and neural correlates identified in regions such as the medial prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and default mode network. Nonverbal cues, including posture, blushing, and gaze aversion, exhibited differences among emotions. Cross-cultural studies highlighted both universal and culturally specific patterns in the elicitation and expression of these emotions. However, limitations such as challenges in experimental induction, ecological validity, and construct operationalization hinder the generalizability and replicability of findings. The predominance of Western-centric studies further restricts cross-cultural applicability. Overall, self-conscious emotions remain underexplored compared to basic emotions, primarily due to methodological and ethical challenges. Future research should prioritize standardized definitions, ecologically valid designs, multimodal measurements, and diverse cultural samples to deepen the understanding of these complex emotions and their implications in clinical, social, and developmental contexts.

Indexed as

embarrassmentguiltprideself-conscious emotionsshame

Identifiers

PMID41312266
PMCPMC12647085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.