SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025
Understanding shame, guilt, embarrassment and pride: a systematic review of self-conscious emotions.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combined DMT-harmine formulation reduces negative self-referential emotions during social self-evaluation: a randomized placebo-controlled trial in healthy volunteers.Psychopharmacology · 2026Article
- Motivations and triggers for non-suicidal self-injury among adolescents with alcohol use disorder in China: a qualitative descriptive study.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2026Article
- Suicidal Distress and Daily Well-Being: A New Model of Social Hysteresis.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Embarrassment in consumer help-seeking: how power distance belief shapes service experiences.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Regional activity and interregional functional connectivity uniquely contribute to social cognitive judgments during movie-watching.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- When style meets strategy: testing the moderating role of regulation strategies in the association between emotional style and self-conscious emotions.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Self-conscious emotions play a crucial role in social functioning, moral behavior, and identity formation. Their inherent complexity, necessitating self-awareness and social evaluation, presents significant challenges for empirical research. This systematic review identifies methodological issues and gaps in experimental research related to the affective traits (valence and arousal), physiological and neural correlates, nonverbal cues, and cross-cultural variations of self-conscious emotions. A comprehensive search was conducted for peer-reviewed empirical studies published between 2000 and 2024 across databases such as PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science, adhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Inclusion criteria focused on studies examining self-conscious emotions through physiological, neurological, behavioral, or cross-cultural approaches. A total of twenty-three studies were included, revealing variability in the valence and arousal profiles of self-conscious emotions, with distinct physiological and neural correlates identified in regions such as the medial prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and default mode network. Nonverbal cues, including posture, blushing, and gaze aversion, exhibited differences among emotions. Cross-cultural studies highlighted both universal and culturally specific patterns in the elicitation and expression of these emotions. However, limitations such as challenges in experimental induction, ecological validity, and construct operationalization hinder the generalizability and replicability of findings. The predominance of Western-centric studies further restricts cross-cultural applicability. Overall, self-conscious emotions remain underexplored compared to basic emotions, primarily due to methodological and ethical challenges. Future research should prioritize standardized definitions, ecologically valid designs, multimodal measurements, and diverse cultural samples to deepen the understanding of these complex emotions and their implications in clinical, social, and developmental contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.