ArticleTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2025
Characteristics and Outcomes of 1500 Lung Transplantations in the Leuven Lung Transplant Program: Turning Past Lessons Into Tomorrow's Foundations.
Article in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phenotyping of chronic lung allograft dysfunction in the ScanCLAD study: a research letter.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Blood vessels as primary site of rejection in murine lung transplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Article
- Association Between Three Lung Donor Scores and Lung Acceptance in DBD and DCD Donors.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Article
- The Top 12 Most Impactful Papers in Clinical Transplantation in 2025: TI Editors' Choice.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung transplantation has become an established life-saving treatment for selected patients with end-stage pulmonary disease. In December 2024, our center reached the milestone of 1,500 lung transplants, providing an opportunity to evaluate long-term trends, outcomes, and challenges. We analyzed donor and recipient demographics, procedural evolution, and graft survival. Contemporary guidelines and consensus recommendations were also reviewed to contextualize current practice and highlight unmet needs. Median graft survival improved markedly across eras: 3.5 years between 1991 and 2000, 9.9 years between 2001 and 2010, and 11.2 years between 2011 and 2020 (p < 0.0001). Shifts in procedure type, donor selection, and transplant indications mirrored broader developments in the field (all p < 0.0001). Donor and recipient age increased significantly over time, with older recipients experiencing poorer long-term outcomes. Despite these advances, chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains the most important barrier to durable success, with median CLAD-free survival of 6.7 years in the modern era (2010-2024) and a retransplantation rate of 4%. While survival now exceeds a decade in many recipients, extended longevity presents new challenges, including management of comorbidities and optimization of CLAD prevention, treatment, and retransplantation strategies. Continued translational research and evidence-based approaches remain critical to improving long-term results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.