Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41312199›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2025

Identification and quality evaluation of Fuyun 6 and Zhongcha 108 tea fresh leaves at different altitudes using non-targeted metabolomics combined with machine learning.

Liangji Wu, Ruixin Lou, Qiang Zhang, Kaikai Li, Tao Hou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Geographical Origin Traceability of Tea (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Liangji WuCollege of Food Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Ruixin LouCollege of Food Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Qiang ZhangEnshi Tujia & Miao Autonomous Prefecture Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Enshi 445000, China.
Kaikai LiCollege of Food Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Tao HouCollege of Food Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tea cultivar and growing altitude are key factors shaping tea quality. This study systematically investigated their individual and synergistic effects on the quality of fresh leaves of Zhongcha 108 (ZC108) and Fuyun 6 (FY6), which were collected at altitudes from 442 to 945 m. Chemical analysis revealed that ZC108 had higher levels of amino acids, theanine, sugars, flavonoids, and catechins than FY6. Increasing altitude reduced tea polyphenols, flavonoids, caffeine, and catechins in both cultivars. Non-targeted metabolomics identified 50 cultivar and 40 altitude-associated metabolites. Key metabolic pathways, including phenylpropanoid, purine, and flavonoid biosynthesis, were upregulated with increasing altitude. A significant cultivar × altitude interaction was observed for coumarin. Machine learning achieved 100 % accuracy in cultivar classification (RF: 96.7 %, SVM: 93.3 %, KNN: 90 %), highlighting the cultivar factors dominance. Key biomarkers, such as phenylethanol and 6-O-β-D-fructofuranosyl-d-glucose were identified. These findings provide a basis for tea cultivar identification, origin traceability, and quality control.

Indexed as

AltitudesChemometricsCultivar × altitude interactionCultivarsNon-targeted metabolomics

Identifiers

PMID41312199
PMCPMC12648093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.