ReviewSAGE open nursing
Structuring Continual Learning Through a Hierarchy of Objectives: A Conceptual Framework.
Review in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Continual learning is fundamental for developing critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Although learning activities are well established in education, the connection between objectives, activities, and learning outcomes is often underemphasized. This article proposes a conceptual model that clarifies how learning processes can be better aligned through a hierarchy of objectives, using nursing education as an illustrative context. Methods: A conceptual analysis was conducted, drawing on established theories, including Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory, the Sociocultural Learning Perspective, and the NLN Jeffries Simulation Theory, to synthesize five core components: hierarchy of objectives, participant, learning activity, learning cycle, and multiple learning activities. Results: The model presents a structured approach to continual learning by clarifying how each component interacts to foster competence development. The model is presented from a general perspective while also specifically providing examples for the healthcare context. Simulation is used to exemplify how learning activities can support long-term learning goals. Conclusions: Understanding the importance of each level of the model and how these levels interact, can assist organizations in pursuing excellence. Accordingly, knowing and defining learning outputs and outcomes is the basis for attain the overarching goals. Facilitating learners to conceptualize reflections into active experimentation requires multiple learning activities, towards a spiral of continual learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.