Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41312151›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone and joint infection2025

Modular megaprostheses yield high any-type failure rate but acceptable infection control rate in patients with chronic hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection and severe bone loss: a single-center experience.

Vladislav Bartak, David Jahoda, Michal Benes, Tobias Judl, Matej Mazura, Petr Fulin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone and joint infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vladislav Bartak1st Department of Orthopaedics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
David Jahoda1st Department of Orthopaedics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Michal Benes1st Department of Orthopaedics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3326-2325
Tobias Judl1st Department of Orthopaedics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6074-3709
Matej Mazura1st Department of Orthopaedics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Petr Fulin1st Department of Orthopaedics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4604-9921

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) complicated by severe bone loss are challenging cases that require complex and specialized treatment approaches. Megaprosthetic replacement has gained in popularity in the setting of chronic hip and knee PJI; however, only a limited number of studies reporting on its utility are available. Thus, we aimed to review our cohort of patients with this specific condition who received modular megaprosthesis (MMP) as a limb salvage option in order to assess the failure rates, infection control, and implant longevity. We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records of 61 patients who received MMPs for chronic hip and knee PJI between 2012 and 2024. The mean follow-up was

Identifiers

PMID41312151
PMCPMC12652866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.