ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Detection of spheno-occipital synchondrosis fusion stages using artificial intelligence.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate evaluation of the spheno-occipital synchondrosis (SOS) is important for growth assessment, early detection of craniofacial anomalies, and reliable forensic age estimation. Methods: This study applied three deep learning models-YOLOv5, YOLOv8, and YOLOv11-to cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) sagittal images from 1,661 individuals aged 6-25 years, aiming to automate SOS fusion stage classification. Model performance was compared in terms of detection accuracy and processing speed. Results: All models achieved high accuracy, with a mean average precision (mAP) of 0.995 in complete fusion (Stage 3). YOLOv8 demonstrated the most consistent balance of precision and recall, while YOLOv11 achieved the fastest inference time (27 ms). YOLOv5 excelled in specific stages with perfect F1-scores. Discussion: These findings demonstrate that YOLO-based AI models can provide precise, rapid, and reproducible SOS assessments, offering valuable support for both clinical decision-making and forensic investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.