Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41312076›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in big data2025

LLM-supported collaborative ontology design for data and knowledge management platforms.

Janis Kampars, Guntis Mosans, Tushar Jogi, Franz Roters, Napat Vajragupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in big data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Janis KamparsInformation Technology Institute, Faculty of Computer Science, Information Technology and Energy, Riga, Latvia.
Guntis MosansInformation Technology Institute, Faculty of Computer Science, Information Technology and Energy, Riga, Latvia.
Tushar JogiMicrostructure Physics and Alloy Design, Max Planck Institute for Sustainable Materials, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Franz RotersMicrostructure Physics and Alloy Design, Max Planck Institute for Sustainable Materials, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Napat VajraguptaVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., Espoo, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of vast, heterogeneous, and multidisciplinary data presents a critical challenge across scientific domains, hindering interoperability and slowing scientific progress. This paper addresses this challenge by presenting a pragmatic extension to the NeOn iterative ontology engineering framework, a well-established methodology for collaborative ontology design, which integrates Large Language Models (LLMs) to accelerate key tasks while retaining domain expert-in-the-loop validation. The methodology was applied within the HyWay project, an EU-funded research initiative on hydrogen-materials interactions, to develop the Hydrogen-Material Interaction Ontology (HMIO), a domain-specific ontology covering 29 experimental methods and 14 simulation types for assessing interactions between hydrogen and advanced metallic materials. A key result is the successful integration of the HMIO into a Data and Knowledge Management Platform (DKMP), where it drives the automated generation of data entry forms, ensuring that all captured data is Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) and HMIO compliant by design. The validation of this approach demonstrates that this hybrid human-machine workflow for ontology engineering and further integration with the DKMP is an effective and efficient strategy for creating and operationalising complex scientific ontologies, thereby providing a scalable solution to advance data-driven research in materials science and other complex scientific domains.

Indexed as

experimentFAIRhydrogenlarge language modelsmetalsontology designsimulation

Identifiers

PMID41312076
PMCPMC12646930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.