Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41312072›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

3D Bioprinting for Custom Bone Grafts in Orthopaedic Trauma: Current Advances and Clinical Translation.

Gaurav Jha, Gagandeep Mahi, Surya Malasani, Mohamed Onsa, Ahmed Barakat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gaurav JhaTrauma and Orthopaedics, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, GBR.
Gagandeep MahiTrauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, GBR.
Surya MalasaniTrauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, GBR.
Mohamed OnsaTrauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, GBR.
Ahmed BarakatTrauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic bone loss in orthopaedic trauma presents significant clinical challenges, particularly arising from high-energy injuries, open fractures with segmental defects, and blast trauma, where bone loss exceeds the critical size for spontaneous healing. Traditional management strategies, including autografts, allografts, and the Masquelet-induced membrane technique, are associated with limitations such as donor site morbidity, prolonged treatment duration, multiple surgical procedures, and suboptimal outcomes. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technology has emerged as a promising solution for fabricating patient-specific bone grafts tailored to individual defect geometry and mechanical requirements.  This narrative review examines current advances in 3D bioprinting specifically for orthopaedic trauma applications, focusing on technologies relevant to long bone reconstruction, load-bearing requirements, and complex fracture management. We analyze various bioprinting modalities, including extrusion-based and stereolithography techniques, alongside biomaterial developments in bioceramics, biodegradable polymers, and mechanically competent composite scaffolds. Clinical applications in femoral and tibial segmental defects, periarticular fractures, and combat-related extremity injuries are reviewed, with emphasis on preclinical large animal models and early clinical experiences. Critical challenges specific to orthopaedic trauma, including mechanical loading demands, infection risk in contaminated wounds, and integration with existing fixation systems, are discussed.  This review examines emerging innovations, such as in situ bioprinting for intraoperative graft fabrication and personalized approaches incorporating patient-derived cells and growth factors. As bioprinting technology continues to mature, integration into orthopaedic trauma protocols promises to reduce treatment complexity, accelerate healing, and improve functional outcomes for patients with devastating skeletal injuries requiring advanced reconstructive solutions.

Indexed as

3d bioprintingbone tissue engineeringcustom bone graftsorthopaedic traumasegmental bone defectstraumatic bone loss

Identifiers

PMID41312072
PMCPMC12647987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.