ArticleNon-coding RNA research2026
Small RNA sequencing in individually selected sperm: Biomarkers for male subfertility and predictors of pregnancy success.
Article in Non-coding RNA research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Coding RNA Biomarkers in Male Infertility: From Discovery to Clinical Actionability-A Narrative Review.Genes · 2026Review
- Genetic alterations in poor-quality individually selected sperm highlight candidate biomarkers for male subfertility.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Epidemiology, Etiopathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Male Infertility-Current Trends and Future Directions: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Clinical Implications of Paternal Age in Assisted Reproduction: Integrating Sperm Epigenetic Evidence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Low expression of hsa-miR-34c-5p in sperm is associated with unexplained recurrent miscarriage.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sperm quality defined by motility and morphology has critical implications for fertility and pregnancy outcomes. Small RNAs, including microRNAs (miRNAs) and Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs), play regulatory roles and may reflect underlying sperm function. This study aimed to identify small RNA types in sperm based on motility and morphology, examine their correlation with sperm and clinical parameters, and develop diagnostic tools to predict pregnancy outcomes. Methods: A total of 98 male partners of couples undergoing infertility treatment were included. Thirteen males provided 39 sperm samples categorized into three groups based on quality: A (good), B (intermediate), and C (poor), each with 1500 individually selected sperm. Additionally, 85 males contributed purified sperm samples with various spermatogenic impairments. Small RNA sequencing was performed followed by RT-qPCR validation. Results: Small RNA sequencing revealed a diverse RNA landscape in sperm, with long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) being the most abundant. Regulatory RNAs such as miRNAs and piRNAs were present at varying levels. Differential expression analysis identified 16 miRNAs and 37 piRNAs significantly different between groups A and C. Strong correlations were observed between miRNA/piRNA expression and sperm motility and morphology in groups A and C, but not in group B. miRNA expression levels were associated with sperm quality and pregnancy outcomes, including embryo quality, β-hCG levels, and live birth. Notably, hsa-miR-15b-5p, hsa-miR-19a-5p, and hsa-miR-20a-5p were linked to sperm impairments and hormonal markers (β-hCG, FSH, and LH). Higher expression of these miRNAs was associated with negative β-hCG outcomes and poor IVF prognosis. Lower expression of hsa-miR-15b-5p and hsa-miR-20a-5p was found in G1 embryos compared to G2 embryos. These miRNAs were also significantly correlated with live birth outcomes: higher expression was linked to failed IVF, while lower expression was linked to successful live births. Diagnostic validation showed AUCs of 0.76, 0.71, and 0.74 for hsa-miR-15b-5p, hsa-miR-19a-5p, and hsa-miR-20a-5p, respectively. A combined model yielded an AUC of 0.75. Conclusion: These findings suggest that hsa-miR-15b-5p, hsa-miR-19a-5p, and hsa-miR-20a-5p could serve as potential biomarkers for assessing sperm quality and predicting pregnancy outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.