ArticleInternational journal of early years education2025
Building Professional Learning Communities in Head Start: A Mixed Methods Study on What it Takes from Teachers' Perspectives.
Article in International journal of early years education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Professional learning communities (PLC) are a form of collaborative professional development consisting of a group of teachers that meet regularly to share ideas and problem solve teaching strategies. PLCs are widely utilized internationally in primary and secondary educational settings, but less is known about their perception and use in the early childhood environment. In this parallel mixed-methods study, we explored North Carolina Head Start preschool teachers' perceptions and experiences with PLCs, through the collection of quantitative survey data (n=168) and qualitative telephone interviews (n=11). We coded and analyzed qualitative data following a phenomenological approach and identified six qualitative themes: (1) Receiving and Providing Support; (2) Mutual Trust and Respect; (3) Structure and Organization; (4) Supervisor Involvement; (5) Learning to Teach Science and Nutrition; and (6) Barriers to PLCs. Integrating both qualitative and quantitative findings, teachers generally perceived PLCs positively but faced barriers. Teachers may lack knowledge in content areas they were interested in forming a PLC around (e.g., science, nutrition). Additional research is warranted to investigate facilitators to overcome teachers' barriers to PLCs and further examine the use and feasibility of PLCs in the Head Start environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.