ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2025
Subtalar Joint Statistical Shape Modeling Differentiates Cavus-to-Planus Foot Types From Weightbearing CT.
Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-Dimensional Osseous Alignment and Morphology Patterns of Ankle and Hindfoot Osteoarthritis.Foot & ankle international · 2026Article
- Radiographic Angle-Based Machine Learning Models for the Diagnosis of Pes Planus and Pes Cavus: A Large-Scale Study Using Weight-Bearing Lateral Foot Radiographs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Asymmetric Cavovarus Deformity Presentation in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Foot type significantly impacts the development and progression of foot and ankle pathologies by influencing biomechanics and force distribution. However, it is typically assessed qualitatively and with a 2D radiographic measurement called Meary's angle. This study seeks to determine the minimum number of bones required in a statistical shape model (SSM) to accurately represent the full cavus through planus spectrum, enabling future machine learning applications in clinical practice. Methods: Our study included weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) data from 151 patients grouped based on clinical diagnosis or Meary's angle: 33 Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT), 29 cavus, 28 rectus, 27 planus, and 34 progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD). Ten multi-bone SSMs, with varying numbers of bones, were created from bony segmentations. Principal component analysis (PCA) assessed the modes of variation for all SSMs. Results: PCA mode 1 demonstrated significant results (α = 0.05) for all SSMs, with the 2-bone subtalar joint (STJ) model capturing the most variance at 70.9% and the largest effect size of 0.75. The mean shape of all SSMs exhibited neutral STJ and midfoot alignment, whereas severe cavus and planus deformities were observed at 2 SDs from the mean shape. Models that included the STJ had statistical differences between all group PCA score comparisons. In contrast, models without the STJ had significant differences between all groups, except between the planus and rectus groups. Conclusion: STJ orientation and morphology appear fundamental for determining foot type. Our study revealed that the STJ alone offers sufficient information for computational differentiation because of its high variance and effect sizes when included in SSMs, highlighting the possible clinical utility as a simplified model. Although full foot models provide additional insights, the STJ model's effectiveness makes it ideal for streamlined assessment and treatment planning. Clinical Relevance: Modeling the STJ captures the full cavus-planus foot type spectrum, suggesting its morphology may drive foot type and related pathologies. This underscores the potential of using simplified models in combination with machine learning as a rapid morphologic classifier; clinical impact remains to be determined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.