ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Comparative safety analysis of Riluzole, Edaravone and Tofersen in ALS management: insights from FAERS database.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder. Riluzole, Edaravone, and Tofersen, three promising treatments, have distinct profiles that merit comparative analysis to guide clinical decision-making. Methods: This study utilizes a pharmacovigilance analysis of adverse events reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database from Q1 2004 to Q2 2024. Employing disproportionality, we assessed and compared the AE signals associated with Riluzole, Edaravone, and Tofersen to elucidate their safety profiles in ALS treatment. Finally, applying the Random Walk with Restart (RWR) algorithm to the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network for selecting drug target genes that have a strong correlation genes associated with severe adverse reactions. Finally, their interactions with the target were assessed through molecular docking and transcriptome analysis. Results: The analysis included 2106 AE reports for Riluzole, 2466 AE reports for Edaravone, and 136 for Tofersen. Highlights the higher incidence of adverse reactions associated with Riluzole, including abdominal discomfort, hypoaesthesia oral, and hepatic enzyme increased, as well as a significant correlation between Edaravone and falls, gait disturbance, and aphasia. Tofersen exhibits different adverse reactions compared to Riluzole and Edaravone, such as headaches, csf red blood cell count positive. Comparative analysis revealed that the three drugs shared a serious adverse reaction, which is thrombosis. RWR analysis identified seven targets related to thrombosis caused by the three drugs, including F10 and MMP9. Subsequently, molecular docking and transcriptome analysis indicate a favorable binding interaction between the drug candidate and the F10 molecule. Conclusion: This comprehensive evaluation underscores the importance of understanding the distinct AE profiles of Riluzole, Edaravone, and Tofersen in clinical practice, providing valuable insights for personalized ALS management. Future research with rigorous prospective designs is recommended to validate these findings and explore the mechanisms underlying the reported adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.