ArticleOncology letters2026
TAS-102 plus bevacizumab as salvage treatment in colorectal cancer: A retrospective study.
Article in Oncology letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 plus bevacizumab therapy as a salvage treatment for colorectal cancer, focusing on the differences between colon and rectal cancers. The present single-center retrospective study enrolled 101 patients treated with TAS-102 between October 2016 and December 2023 (median age, 67 years; 65 men and 36 women). The tumors included 16, 23 and 62 lesions in the right colon, left colon and rectum, respectively. The chemotherapy history included fluoropyrimidine (101 patients, 100%), oxaliplatin (95 patients, 94.1%), irinotecan (82 patients, 81.2%), anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody (92 patients, 91.1%) and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody (41 patients, accounting for 87.2% of the RAS wild-type subgroup). The median duration of TAS-102 plus bevacizumab treatment was 184 days. A subsequent line of chemotherapy was administered in 66 patients (65.3%). The progression-free survival (PFS) time was 5.6 months, whereas the overall survival (OS) time was 14.2 months. Colon and rectal cancers exhibited a PFS of 4.0 and 6.9 months, and an OS of 11.0 and 17.6 months, respectively. The results of the present study suggested that TAS-102 combined with bevacizumab in subsequent treatment may have greater efficacy in rectal cancer than in colon cancer, possibly due to the lower frequency of liver metastases in rectal cancer. However, this finding is exploratory and requires further validation via larger prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.