ArticleCureus2025
Anesthetic Management and Considerations of Diaphragmatic Pacemaker Placement for Cervical Spine Injury: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High cervical spinal cord injuries (SCIs) can lead to diaphragmatic paralysis, necessitating long-term mechanical ventilation. Diaphragmatic pacemakers (DPs) offer an alternative by stimulating the phrenic nerve to restore diaphragmatic function, thereby improving quality of life and reducing ventilator dependence. However, anesthetic management for DP placement presents unique challenges due to the need to preserve diaphragmatic activity and manage autonomic instability. This case reports a 35-year-old male with complete C4 SCI resulting in quadriplegia and respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation. After multiple interventions, including spinal fusion and tracheostomy, he underwent DP placement to reduce ventilator dependency. The patient was successfully transitioned to DP postoperatively and discharged from the hospital on room air via a tracheostomy collar. DP is a valuable intervention for high cervical SCI patients but requires anesthetic strategies that preserve diaphragmatic function and manage common complications such as pneumothorax, autonomic dysreflexia, and ventilator challenges with abdominal insufflation. Avoiding muscle relaxants, continuous diaphragmatic monitoring, and proactive hemodynamic management are essential. The literature highlights rare but serious device-related complications, emphasizing the importance of vigilant intraoperative monitoring and interdisciplinary planning. As DP becomes more accessible, particularly in community hospitals, anesthesiologists must be prepared to navigate its perioperative challenges. This case underscores the importance of tailored anesthetic approaches to support safe and effective DP implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.