ArticleFrontiers in dental medicine2025
Innovation of clockwise osseodensification technique for primary stability in dental implant: a low-density bone cadaveric study.
Article in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative evaluation of implant stability using three osteotomy techniques- a randomised clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Current Updates and Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This cadaveric study evaluated the effect of a novel clockwise osseodensification (OD) technique on primary implant stability in low-density bone. Materials and methods: Forty implants were placed in paired sites of nine formalin-fixed human tibiae, comparing OD ( Results: The OD group showed higher mean ISQ (67.5 ± 6.5) and IT (34.0 ± 6.6 Ncm) values than the SD group (62.9 ± 9.3; 29.5 ± 7.6 Ncm, respectively), although these differences were not statistically significant ( Discussion: These findings indicate that OD produces more consistent stability values and a stronger IT-ISQ relationship than SD, potentially enhancing the reliability of resonance frequency analysis in low-density bone. Unlike conventional counterclockwise OD, Clockwise OD uses densifying burs in the cutting direction at moderate speeds (800 rpm), offering a simpler, less technique-sensitive alternative without sacrificing the benefits of bone condensation. Within the limitations of a cadaveric model, OD demonstrated consistent stability values and a trend toward improved primary mechanical outcomes compared with SD. Further
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.