ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025
MASE-GC: a multi-omics autoencoder and stacking ensemble framework for gastric cancer classification.
Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignant tumors and remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Accurate classification of GC is critical for improving diagnosis, prognosis, and personalized treatment. Recent advances in high-throughput sequencing have enabled the generation of large-scale multi-omics data, offering new opportunities for precise disease stratification. However, existing studies often rely on single-omics approaches or single-model frameworks, which fail to capture the full complexity of tumor biology and suffer from limited sensitivity, specificity, and generalizability. Methods: We propose MASE-GC (Multi-Omics Autoencoder and Stacking Ensemble for Gastric Cancer), a novel computational framework that integrates exon expression, mRNA expression, miRNA expression, and DNA methylation profiles. MASE-GC employs modality-specific autoencoders to extract compact latent features from heterogeneous omics layers and combines them through weighted fusion. The integrated features are then classified using a stacking ensemble of five base learners-Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, Decision Tree, AdaBoost, and Convolutional Neural Network-followed by an XGBoost meta-classifier. A robust preprocessing pipeline, including feature filtering, normalization, and SMOTE-Tomek balancing, is incorporated to address noise, high dimensionality, and class imbalance. Results: Comprehensive experiments on the TCGA-STAD cohort demonstrated that MASE-GC achieved superior classification performance compared with single-omics and baseline methods, reaching an accuracy of 0.981, precision of 0.9845, recall of 0.992, F1-score of 0.9883, and specificity of 0.824. Ablation studies confirmed the complementary contributions of autoencoders and ensemble components, with CNN and Random Forest providing the largest performance gains. Furthermore, independent validation on external cohorts (GSE62254, GSE15459, GSE84437, and ICGC) confirmed the robustness and generalizability of MASE-GC, with accuracy consistently above 0.958 and F1-scores exceeding 0.969. Conclusion: MASE-GC advances computational oncology by offering an effective and generalizable framework for GC classification. By integrating multi-omics fusion, ensemble learning, and robust preprocessing, the proposed model improves both sensitivity and specificity, reduces false positives, and demonstrates strong potential for clinical translation in precision diagnostics and treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.