ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2026
Anatomic Structures at Risk With Antegrade Intramedullary Fixation of the First Metacarpal Using Three Start Points: Is There A Safe Zone?
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Intramedullary fixation of extraarticular first metacarpal fractures using a percutaneous technique may risk injury to important anatomic structures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate potential safe zones for antegrade implant entry of the first metacarpal and describe the anatomical structures at risk. Methods: Ten cadaveric hands were used to evaluate three start points located at the first metacarpal base: volar-radial, dorsal-radial, and dorsal-ulnar. A fluoroscopic imaging system was used to guide percutaneous placement of 0.8 mm × 100 mm guidewires and 2.0 mm diameter screws. After screw placement the guidewires were left in place and soft tissues were dissected to identify at risk anatomic structures. Results: The identified structures at risk were the radial artery, superficial branch of the radial nerve (SBRN), extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tendon, abductor pollicis longus (APL) tendon, and extensor pollicis brevis (EPB) tendon. A volar-radial start point risks injury to the APL tendon (8.3 ± 5.4 mm). A dorsal-radial start point risks injury to the SBRN (2.2 ± 3.4 mm), APL (1.4 ± 1.8 mm), and EPB (1.2 ± 2.1 mm) tendons. A dorsal-ulnar start point risks injury to the SBRN (5 ± 4.2 mm), radial artery (3.5 ± 3.1 mm), and EPL tendon (3.5 ± 2.4 mm). Conclusions: Dorsal-radial and dorsal-ulnar start points risk injuring critical anatomic structures: radial artery, SBRN, EPL, APL, and EPB. A volar-radial start point may risk injury to the APL tendon but presents the lowest risk of injury to neurovascular structures. Clinical relevance: This study identifies key anatomic structures at risk associated with three common percutaneous entry points. The volar-radial start point demonstrated the lowest risk to neurovascular structures and may represent a safe approach for percutaneous intramedullary fixation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.