Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41311626›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025

Smart technologies and the future of concussion prevention in ice hockey.

Arto Gråstén

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Arto GråsténPhysical Education Department, College of Education, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Concussions in ice hockey remain a major concern, especially among young players. Current helmets mainly protect against skull fractures but offer limited shielding from brain acceleration forces. Methods: A narrative review of epidemiological studies, helmet safety research, and technological innovations in other sports like cycling, equestrian, and football was conducted to assess limitations of current helmets and the potential for advanced protective systems. Results: Concussion rates remain relatively high, with inconsistent diagnoses making comparisons difficult. Standard helmets show minimal performance differences and have limited ability to reduce rotational forces. Innovations like wearable sensors integrated into helmets offer notable protection benefits in other sports. However, hockey-specific concerns include repeated impacts, usability, and weight limits. Discussion: Smart technologies such as airbag helmets present a viable path toward enhanced protection in ice hockey. Translating these solutions requires engineering adaptation, interdisciplinary collaboration, and cultural acceptance, especially urgent in youth sport, where long-term risks are greatest.

Indexed as

athletehead trauma preventionhealthprotective equipmentsports-related injury

Identifiers

PMID41311626
PMCPMC12647039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.