ArticleIranian journal of nursing and midwifery research
Students' Assessment of Digital Technologies in Nursing Education.
Article in Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: E-learning, including platforms like Google Classroom and Moodle, has become integral to nursing education, offering flexibility and adapting to the changing educational system. Despite varied student responses, the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the shift to online nursing education at Karaganda Medical University, prompting an evaluation of platforms like Zoom, WebEx, Google Classroom, and Moodle for their quality and convenience. This study, based on the students' perspective, contributes to ongoing efforts to optimize online platforms for nursing education at Karaganda Medical University. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted by a group of lecturers in December 2023 at Karaganda Medical University, Kazakhstan. The study adopted a quantitative approach, employing a survey methodology administered to 154 second-year students enrolled in the academic bachelor's degree program in Nursing. Participants were chosen through convenience sampling, and they were tasked with rating educational platforms and programs based on predefined criteria, utilizing a 5-point scale. Data analysis was carried out using descriptive statistics, calculating relative values for comparative analysis. Results: Comparative analysis was conducted on two prominent educational platforms-Google Classroom and Moodle-and two programs designed for online consultations and classes-WebEx and Zoom. All obtained data is presented in tables for clarity. Conclusions: An analysis of the preferences of second-year undergraduate students regarding educational platforms and online programs identified the main criteria important for the learning process. This research can be used to further improve educational platforms and enhance the quality of education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.