Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41311592›Full record

ReviewIranian journal of nursing and midwifery research

e-Professionalism in Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Fataneh Ghadirian, Mahsa Hayati

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fataneh GhadirianDepartment of Psychiatric Nursing and Management, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahsa HayatiDepartment of Psychiatric Nursing and Management, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study systematically examines the challenges and issues of digital professionalism in Psychiatric Mental Health (PMH) nursing over the past decade, addressing the lack of recent research in this area. Materials and Methods: Conducted as a systematic review, it analyzed a subset of 12 studies focusing on e-professionalism in PMH nursing. The search was performed in April 2023 across databases including Medline, EMBASE, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane, covering papers published between January 2013 and April 2023. The quality of the primary papers was evaluated using the Kmet standard criteria, and a narrative synthesis approach was used to summarize the findings. Results: The results reveal that e-professionalism issues in PMH nursing, particularly in legal and ethical dimensions, have received little attention in recent studies. The study identified two competing scenarios in mental telehealth nursing, emphasizing the need to find a balance between them for successful implementation. Conclusions: The findings highlight the importance of psychiatric mental health nurses developing a comprehensive understanding of e-mental health interventions, including knowledge, skills, affective factors, ethics, and regulatory considerations. The study concludes by calling for greater focus on digital professionalism in PMH nursing to address the evolving challenges in the field.

Indexed as

Digitalprofessionalismpsychiatric mental health nursingtelehealthtelenursing

Identifiers

PMID41311592
PMCPMC12655831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.