ArticleActa Cardiologica Sinica2025
Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Ischemic Stroke: A Single-Center Experience.
Article in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of patent foramen ovale (PFO) is higher in patients who have experienced a cryptogenic ischemic stroke. Recent trials have demonstrated the efficacy of PFO closure in preventing recurrent cerebrovascular events. This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of percutaneous PFO closure at a tertiary center in Northern Taiwan. Methods: A total of 21 patients underwent transcatheter PFO closure between 2014 and 2022. Eighteen patients with a history of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack were further analyzed to assess their stroke risk, imaging studies, perioperative adverse events, and post-procedure outcomes. The follow-up period spanned from 2014 to 2023. Results: Of the 18 patients, the proportion of males was higher (79%), and the average age was 48.4 years. Dyslipidemia was the most common comorbidity (50%), and 44.4% of the patients had cerebral vascular stenosis. The most common intra-operative event was premature atrial contractions. Post-procedure adverse events included headache, local hematoma, chest tightness, and bradycardia. During follow-up, three patients (16.7%) had recurrent cerebrovascular events, potentially associated with intracranial arterial stenosis as seen in brain imaging. The average recurrence rate of stroke after PFO closure was 3.5 events per 100 patient-years. Conclusions: Transcatheter PFO closure could be considered as secondary prevention for patients younger than 60 years with cryptogenic ischemic stroke. The underlying diseases and anatomic features of PFO should be evaluated comprehensively to inform shared decision-making. Post-procedure follow-up includes evaluating cardiac arrhythmia and underlying diseases contributing to cerebrovascular stenosis, as they may be associated with recurrent stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.