Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41311536›Full record

ArticleJournal of otology2025

Optogenetic Infection and Optical Stimulation: A Study on Auditory Responses in Guinea Pig Cochlear Neurons.

Chen Liu, Ning Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of otology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chen LiuSenior Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China.
Ning YuSenior Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to establish an economically viable and easily accessible adult animal model for optogenetic activation of auditory neurons using adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) carrying ChR2(H134R) to explore the potential of cochlear optogenetics as a hearing restoration technology. Methods: Healthy adult guinea pigs were used in the experiments. The viral vector AAV2/8-ChR2(H134R)-hSyn-eYFP was administered to the right cochlea via the round window membrane. The confocal microscopy and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were utilized to analyze the ChR2(H134R) expression localized to spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs). The auditory pathway activation was assessed by recording the optical compound action potential (oCAP) and acoustic compound action potential (aCAP) at various laser intensities. Results: The ChR2(H134R)-eYFP expression was confirmed in 90% of the tested animals, localized to the SGNs of the injected ear. Higher mRNA levels of ChR2(H134R) and eYFP were observed in the injected ear compared to the non-injected ear, while actin (Actb) mRNA levels were not significantly different. The oCAP was successfully elicited by a 470 nm blue light laser stimulus, with similar amplitudes and latency periods to those of aCAPs when the oCAP was evoked by 5.80 mW blue light and the aCAP was evoked by a 40 dB SPL click. The amplitudes of oCAPs increased with increasing laser intensity. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the viability of optogenetic activation of the auditory system in adult guinea pigs through the transduction of AAV-ChR2(H134R) in SGNs. Cochlear optogenetics demonstrates potential as a hearing restoration technology, providing a basis for further clinical research and opening new avenues for investigation.

Indexed as

CochlearGuinea pigsHearing restorationOptogeneticsSpiral ganglion neurons

Identifiers

PMID41311536
PMCPMC12647956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.