ArticleEJHaem2025
Anaphylaxis During CAR T-Cell Infusion in an HIV-Positive Patient With High-Grade B-Cell Lymphoma: A Case Report and Literature Review.
Article in EJHaem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a highly effective treatment for relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), but clinical experience in people living with HIV (PLWH) remains limited due to their exclusion from pivotal trials. We report the case of a 55-year-old man with HIV and high-grade B-cell lymphoma who developed severe anaphylaxis during axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) infusion, requiring early termination after approximately 50% of the planned dose was delivered. The patient experienced only Grade 1 cytokine release syndrome and no neurotoxicity. Despite incomplete infusion, he achieved a sustained partial metabolic response on PET/CT imaging at Days +30, +60, and +110 post-infusion. HIV remained well-controlled throughout, and no infectious complications were observed. This case highlights both the feasibility of administering CAR T-cell therapy in virologically suppressed PLWH and the potential for clinical benefit even with partial cell delivery. In addition, it draws attention to anaphylaxis as a rare but serious infusion-related adverse event. To our knowledge, this is the first report of anaphylaxis to axi-cel in a PLWH. The case underscores the need for enhanced pharmacovigilance and pre-infusion risk assessment. It also supports growing evidence that PLWH should not be categorically excluded from CAR T-cell access or clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.