ArticleDialogues in health2025
"Stories like ours continue": A phenomenological exploration of the lived experiences of ex-serial clinical trial volunteers in South India.
Article in Dialogues in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Indian media has frequently highlighted the plight of vulnerable low-income groups who over-volunteer in clinical trials to make ends meet, often at the cost of their health. Despite these revelations, the lived experiences of these individuals remain insufficiently documented in academic literature. This study seeks to address this gap by exploring how clinical trial volunteers construct their world around their experiences of having taken part in multiple trials over a span of time. Additionally, the study aims to shed light on the current circumstances and challenges faced by these individuals and their families. Methods: Using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis, this study analyses in-depth interviews conducted using respondent-driven sampling. Participants include three ex-serial volunteers who discontinued clinical trial participation and three key informants of deceased serial trial volunteers, from a remote mandal in the state of Telengana, South India. Results: Three superordinate themes emerged: Conclusion: Despite existing government regulations, the underground nature of recruitment networks and the persistent demand for willing participants enable these practices to thrive. Findings underscore the urgent need for a national registry, stronger oversight, and community-level awareness to ensure ethical, scientifically sound, and socially responsible clinical research in India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.