Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41311520›Full record

SynthesisOpen research Europe2025

Soil contamination in Europe unveiled: A review of pesticides and metabolites to watch.

Raquel Carvalho, Paula Guedes, Eduardo P Mateus, Vera Silva, Pavlos Tyrologou, Nikolaos Koukouzas, Alexandra B Ribeiro, Nazaré Couto

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Open research Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Raquel CarvalhoCENSE - Center for Environmental and Sustainability Research & CHANGE - Global Change and Sustainability Institute, NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8355-5545
Paula GuedesDepartment of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5853-0192
Eduardo P MateusCENSE - Center for Environmental and Sustainability Research & CHANGE - Global Change and Sustainability Institute, NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.
Vera SilvaSoil Physics and Land Management Group, Wageningen University & Research, 670PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Pavlos TyrologouChemical Process & Energy Resources Institute CPERI, Centre for Research & Technology Hellas CERTH, Maroussi, 15125, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7706-1774
Nikolaos KoukouzasChemical Process & Energy Resources Institute CPERI, Centre for Research & Technology Hellas CERTH, Maroussi, 15125, Athens, Greece.
Alexandra B RibeiroCENSE - Center for Environmental and Sustainability Research & CHANGE - Global Change and Sustainability Institute, NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5606-3591
Nazaré CoutoCENSE - Center for Environmental and Sustainability Research & CHANGE - Global Change and Sustainability Institute, NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2911-6432

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil is multifunctional and fundamental for both humans and ecosystem health. However, it faces growing threats from contamination, particularly from pesticides. In this review, pesticide contamination trends across Europe were assessed by analysing published data from 5193 sampled soils collected between 2015 and 2022. By raking pesticides based on detection frequency, persistence and toxicity, key concerns were brought to attention, including the presence of banned substances, such as p,p'-DDT (detected in 31% of sampled soils) and Atrazine (17%), as well as high detection rates of currently approved pesticides like Boscalid (36%) and Epoxiconazole (32%). Results also revealed regional contamination patterns and differences. Greece and Poland presented a strong association with non-approved pesticides. The presence of these substances, although long banned, raises concerns about their origin, persistence and potential cross-border pollution. In contrast, Portugal appears to be more associated with currently approved pesticides. Furthermore, metabolites like AMPA, a degradation product of Glyphosate, was detected in 44% of soils, which highlights the contribution of metabolites in long-term contamination risks. The metabolite 1,2,4-triazole has been proposed as a potential indicator of soil pesticide contamination, which could enhance monitoring and reduce associated costs. These results point out the limitations of currently regulatory frameworks, which often fail to account for environmental transport, persistent residues, and policies related to pesticide distribution across countries. To protect soil health, monitoring programs and remediation strategies are necessary. Establishing more comprehensive legislation for both active substances and their breakdown products is essential to mitigate long-term contamination risks.

Indexed as

pesticide residues and metabolitessoil contaminationsoil health

Identifiers

PMID41311520
PMCPMC12648036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.