Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41311508›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025

Minimally invasive aspiration of thrombi and masses in left-sided cardiac chambers: a comprehensive literature review.

Ziyad Gunga, Augustin Rigollot, Margaux Wolff, David Meier, Eric Eeckhout, Valentina Rancati, Zied Ltaief, Mario Verdugo-Merchese, Olivier Muller, Matthias Kirsch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ziyad GungaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Augustin RigollotDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Margaux WolffDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
David MeierDepartment of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Eric EeckhoutLausanne University, UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Valentina RancatiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Zied LtaiefDepartment of Anesthesiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mario Verdugo-MercheseDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Olivier MullerDepartment of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Matthias KirschDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of large intracardiac masses, such as thrombi, tumors, or endocarditic vegetations, presents significant challenges due to their friable nature and the risks of embolization or hemodynamic compromise. While surgical removal remains the gold standard, it is often contraindicated in high-risk patients. Minimally invasive techniques, particularly thromboaspiration, offer a promising alternative, especially for left-sided cardiac chambers where systemic circulation and delicate anatomy heighten procedural risks. This review analyzes the evolving role of thromboaspiration for left-sided cardiac masses, focusing on 24 cases from 14 studies published between 2014 and 2024. Most cases utilized the AngioVac® system, with others employing devices such as Lasso®, Occlutech®, and Amplatz® systems. Neuroprotection was implemented in 79% of cases, primarily using Sentinel® devices. Access was predominantly transseptal, though transapical, transcaval, and femoral routes were also utilized. Notably, 88% of procedures were performed without ECMO support. The results highlight a high success rate (92%) in mass removal with minimal complications, although potential publication bias must be acknowledged. This success underscores thromboaspiration's viability not only for patients unfit for surgery but also for those with intracavitary or pedunculated thrombi. Thromboaspiration represents a less invasive, effective solution for managing left-sided cardiac masses, expanding its applicability beyond right-sided cases. This review emphasizes the need for further studies to establish standardized protocols and encourage broader adoption of this innovative technique in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AngioVacinnovationleft-sided massesneuroprotection devicenovel proceduresthromboaspiration

Identifiers

PMID41311508
PMCPMC12650768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.