Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41311504›Full record

ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Outcomes Comparing 19,769 Patients Who Underwent Robotic, Laparoscopic, or Open Colorectal Surgery.

Valerie K Vazquez, Laura Mena Albors, Huazhi Liu, Darwin Ang

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Valerie K VazquezDepartment of Surgery, University of Central Florida/HCA Consortium-Ocala, Ocala, Florida, USA. (Drs. Vazquez and Albors).
Laura Mena AlborsDepartment of Surgery, University of Central Florida/HCA Consortium-Ocala, Ocala, Florida, USA. (Drs. Vazquez and Albors).
Huazhi LiuHCA Florida Ocala Health Systems, Ocala, Florida, USA. (Dr. Liu).
Darwin AngDepartment of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA. (Dr. Ang).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study examines the efficacy of robotic colorectal surgery across a large health system, focusing on factors such as hospital stay, operative time, pain management, and postoperative complications. The objective of this study is to compare outcomes of colorectal surgery by robotic, laparoscopic, and open techniques in a multicenter study. Methods: A retrospective cohort study analyzed patients undergoing colorectal surgery from 2016 to 2022 using a clinical database from a large United States hospital system. Multivariable regression adjusted outcomes for various patient factors and institutional practices. Results: Among 19,769 patients, robotic surgery was associated with shorter hospital stays (5.6 days vs 7.9 for laparoscopic and 11.2 for open, Conclusion: Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery may lead to decreased hospital stays, readmission rates, and improved patient outcomes across various healthcare settings.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePatient ReadmissionPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesClinical outcomesColorectal surgeryLaparoscopic surgeryMulticenterRobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID41311504
PMCPMC12651950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.