ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Oral suction capacity in breastfeeding vs. bottle feeding. A systematic review.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Associated factors of nipple fissures in early postpartum women: A retrospective case-control study.Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to ascertain whether breastfed infants exhibit superior oral sucking abilities compared with bottle-fed infants. Methods: A systematic review was conducted, encompassing four databases associated with professional health practices: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Dimensions. The review encompassed articles published from 2010 onward, and included children up to the age of 2 y under normotypic conditions. The search was conducted using a query constructed from keywords that considered MeSH terms, and the query was applied in all databases. The systematic review was performed following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, and the methodological quality was assessed using the MINORS scale. Results: Behaviors related to maternal suckling, such as position, mother-child bonding, adequacy of suckling, baby responses, and anatomy, showed that the group of bottle-fed babies performed poorly in the five behaviors analyzed ( Conclusion: The mechanics of sucking exhibits differences in oral motor behavior between bottle-fed and breastfed infants, favoring the latter group. However, these disparities appear inconsequential in children receiving mixed feeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.