ArticleEpidemiology and infection2025
Evaluating Google Trends as a proxy for symptom incidence: insights from the winter COVID-19 infection study in England 2023/24.
Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recommendations for the analysis of leading indicators in epidemic surveillance.PLOS digital health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Google Trends is used in research and surveillance as a proxy for community infection incidence. Signals are difficult to validate, as most surveillance biases towards severe outcomes and certain demographics.Using Winter COVID-19 Infection Study (WCIS) data in England, symptom prevalence is estimated via generalized additive model with multilevel-regression and poststratification. Symptom duration was estimated using interval censored time delay modelling, converting prevalence to incidence. Google Trends and WCIS incidence and growth rates were compared using cross-correlation.Google Trends and WCIS agreement varied by symptom and age group. The national maximum growth rate cross-correlation for sore throat was 0.81, with 90% prediction intervals of [0.69, 0.90]. Google Trends growth rates generally lagged the WCIS growth rates across symptoms (cough: -5.0 days [-8.0, 0.0], fever: -3.0 days [-6.0, 1.0], loss of smell: -9.0 days [-13, -3.0], shortness of breath: -12 days [-16, -5.0], and sore throat: -4.0 days [-5.0, -2.0]).This work shows Google Trends and community symptom incidence can align, although substantial variation between symptoms and age groups exists, underscoring utility in predicting other surveillance indicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.