Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41311255›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2025

Evaluating Google Trends as a proxy for symptom incidence: insights from the winter COVID-19 infection study in England 2023/24.

Phoebe Asplin, Martyn Fyles, Jack Kennedy, Thomas Ward, Jonathon Mellor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Phoebe Asplinhttps://ror.org/00vbvha87UK Health Security Agency, UK.
Martyn Fyleshttps://ror.org/00vbvha87UK Health Security Agency, UK.
Jack Kennedyhttps://ror.org/00vbvha87UK Health Security Agency, UK.
Thomas Wardhttps://ror.org/00vbvha87UK Health Security Agency, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8801-747X
Jonathon Mellorhttps://ror.org/00vbvha87UK Health Security Agency, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8743-0817

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/S022244/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Google Trends is used in research and surveillance as a proxy for community infection incidence. Signals are difficult to validate, as most surveillance biases towards severe outcomes and certain demographics.Using Winter COVID-19 Infection Study (WCIS) data in England, symptom prevalence is estimated via generalized additive model with multilevel-regression and poststratification. Symptom duration was estimated using interval censored time delay modelling, converting prevalence to incidence. Google Trends and WCIS incidence and growth rates were compared using cross-correlation.Google Trends and WCIS agreement varied by symptom and age group. The national maximum growth rate cross-correlation for sore throat was 0.81, with 90% prediction intervals of [0.69, 0.90]. Google Trends growth rates generally lagged the WCIS growth rates across symptoms (cough: -5.0 days [-8.0, 0.0], fever: -3.0 days [-6.0, 1.0], loss of smell: -9.0 days [-13, -3.0], shortness of breath: -12 days [-16, -5.0], and sore throat: -4.0 days [-5.0, -2.0]).This work shows Google Trends and community symptom incidence can align, although substantial variation between symptoms and age groups exists, underscoring utility in predicting other surveillance indicators.

Indexed as

COVID-19Search EngineAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolEnglandFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantMaleMiddle AgedPharyngitisSARS-CoV-2Community surveillanceinternet searchsymptom

Identifiers

PMID41311255
PMCPMC12722558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.