ArticleEnvironmental toxicology2026
Toxicity of Four Common Environmental Chemicals Across Caenorhabditis elegans Life Stages Supporting the One Health Concept.
Article in Environmental toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pesticides and pharmaceuticals are among the most common chemical groups in waterbodies and soils, and their universal distribution raises concerns about potential adverse effects on nontarget organisms and humans. Reproductive output disruption is of particular concern, as it transposes effects from the individual to the next generations at the population level, requiring precise identification of the affected processes. Caenorhabditis elegans , with its well-known lifecycle, is an excellent model organism for investigating such effects within the One Health framework. The present study evaluated the toxicity of four globally prevalent chemicals: the insecticides cypermethrin and flupyradifurone, the herbicide MCPA, and the pharmaceutical diclofenac, at different C. elegans life stages to determine possible effects on different reproductive processes. Embryotoxicity was evaluated by the hatching rates of exposed eggs. Developmental toxicity was assessed by exposing L1 larvae for 96 h and measuring total offspring production and feeding rate. Intergenerational effects were evaluated by hatching rates of in utero exposed eggs (removed from exposed adults). Our results indicate that all substances affected C. elegans in one or more different life stages. Cypermethrin and MCPA showed the highest developmental toxicity, while the latter was also the most toxic for embryo development and intergenerational effects. This targeted approach highlights unexpected reproductive impacts unrelated to the chemicals' primary modes of action. Our findings emphasize the potential of C. elegans in developing adverse outcome pathways, contributing to more realistic hazard predictions regarding human health and animal well-being and protecting the environment within the One Health approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.