Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41311152›Full record

ArticleHealth (London, England : 1997)2026

A challenging little balance: How white doulas with mainstream training understand and engage with anti-oppressive practice.

Nina Zettl-Lee, Jan Gelech, Jordan Wellsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health (London, England : 1997), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nina Zettl-LeeDepartment of Psychology and Health Studies, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Jan GelechDepartment of Psychology and Health Studies, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9464-3960
Jordan WellschDepartment of Psychology and Health Studies, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Though the benefits of doula care in reducing birth inequities and mitigating obstetric violence are well established, little is known about how White doulas from mainstream training programs (most doulas in Canada) understand and implement anti-oppressive practice (AOP) in different sociocultural contexts. Guided by interpretative phenomenological analysis, we conducted life history and semi-structured interviews with five White doulas working in Western Canada. The doulas described varying levels of engagement, confidence, and effectiveness across three distinct levels of sociopolitical interaction: relationships with birthing families (micro level), supporting clients within biomedical institutions (meso level), and advocating for enhanced maternal care within the broader structural landscape (macro level). Differences in AOP across these three sociopolitical contexts and between doulas were connected to various factors, including mainstream doula training, healthcare politics, professional structures, local histories, and individual preferences and circumstances. Implications for mainstream doula education, interprofessional collaboration, and hospital birthing practices are discussed.

Indexed as

DoulasCanadaDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicPregnancyQualitative Researchanti-oppressive practicechildbirthdoulahealth disparitiesmaternityobstetric violence

Identifiers

PMID41311152
PMCPMC13272833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.