Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41311034›Full record

SynthesisMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025

Effect of Dexmedetomidine Dose on Reducing Delirium in Adults: An Indirect Comparison of Controlled Trials.

Jie Zhang, Lei Pang, Xihua Zhu, Kun Wei, Xi Jiang, Si Liu

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jie ZhangDepartment of Anesthesia, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Lei PangDepartment of Anesthesia, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Xihua ZhuDepartment of Psychiatry Intensive Care Unit, The Third Hospital of Heilongjiang, Bei'an, Heilongjiang, China.
Kun WeiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Xi JiangHealth Management Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Si LiuDepartment of Urology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Postoperative delirium affects recovery. Dexmedetomidine shows promise in reducing it, but the ideal dose is unclear. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. Studies from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were retrieved. Only trials involving adults (≥18 years) were considered. The effectiveness of high (loading dose, >0.5 µg/kg) and low doses (loading dose, ≤0.5 µg/kg) of dexmedetomidine in preventing delirium was examined, along with the incidence of delirium and adverse events like hypotension and bradycardia. RESULTS High-dose dexmedetomidine was associated with a lower delirium incidence compared to low-dose. The incidence of bradycardia or hypotension did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. However, some included studies had small sample sizes, focused on intraoperative use, or had potential data bias and heterogeneity in the low-dose group. CONCLUSIONS High-dose dexmedetomidine may be more effective in reducing postoperative delirium without increasing the risk of bradycardia or hypotension. But due to study limitations, more randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

DeliriumDexmedetomidineAdultBradycardiaDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansHypotensionPostoperative ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicDexmedetomidine

Identifiers

PMID41311034
PMCPMC12729251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.