Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41310999›Full record

ArticleJournal of fish biology2026

Experimentally testing the function of anal fins in the bluefin killifish, Lucania goodei.

Edie Smelko, Rebecca C Fuller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of fish biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Edie SmelkoDepartment of Evolution, Ecology, and Behavior, School of Integrative Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Rebecca C FullerDepartment of Evolution, Ecology, and Behavior, School of Integrative Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5744-8012

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anal fins are thought to affect many functions, including swimming, sperm flow and signalling. However, there are few experimental demonstrations of these functions. We manipulated male anal fins by placing a cut in the fin. We found that cut males had lower fertilization rates than uncut males. Females were less likely to be courted and guarded by cut than uncut males. Uncut males were more likely to dominate in male/male competition. Our study suggests that anal fins have multiple important functions for fertilization and reproduction.

Indexed as

Animal FinsFundulidaeAnimalsFemaleFertilizationMaleSexual Behavior, Animalanal finclaspingfitness componentsFundulidaeunpaired fins

Identifiers

PMID41310999
PMCPMC13357256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.