ArticleOTJR : occupation, participation and health2026
Strengthening Community-Academic Partnerships to Enhance Care for Sickle Cell Disease.
Article in OTJR : occupation, participation and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sickle cell disease 115 years later: improving health outcomes through policy, research, and collaboration, to achieve health equity.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sickle cell disease (SCD) affects approximately 100,000 Americans, predominantly those of African descent, yet care coordination between academic medical centers and community organizations remains limited. To identify strategies for strengthening community-academic partnerships to enhance care delivery for children with SCD through focus groups with community partners in a midwestern metropolitan area. Using qualitative descriptive methodology, we conducted two focus groups and three individual interviews with 12 community partners, including health care providers and advocates. Thematic analysis revealed three key findings: persistent multi-level knowledge gaps about SCD, the importance of strategic partnerships between health care organizations and community groups, and specific community-identified solutions for sustainable collaboration. Results highlighted how structured partnerships between academic institutions and community organizations can address systemic barriers in SCD care delivery through knowledge sharing, resource access, and coordinated screening protocols, informing practical strategies for implementing sustainable improvements in care coordination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.