ReviewHuman brain mapping2025
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Neuronavigation for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Mood Disorders: Technical Foundation, Advances, and Emerging Tools.
Review in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Subgenual anterior cingulate cortex in major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of MRI studies with patients and healthy controls.Translational psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Mixed reality assisted target localization for transcranial magnetic stimulation navigation: a feasibility study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Digital twin brain reveals state-specific stimulation targets for abnormal brain dynamics in tinnitus.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Neuronavigation for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Mood Disorders: Technical Foundation, Advances, and Emerging Tools.Human brain mapping · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) guided by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has significantly advanced the treatment of mood disorders by enabling precise targeting of brain circuits implicated in their pathophysiology. The integration of neuronavigation systems, which utilize real-time MRI-based coil positioning, has improved spatial targeting accuracy, individualization, and therapeutic outcomes. Despite these advancements, achieving optimal stimulation efficacy requires careful consideration of MRI techniques, including anatomical imaging, functional MRI (fMRI), and connectivity-based methods. Anatomical MRI provides a reliable structural foundation for neuronavigation but lacks specificity regarding functional neural networks implicated in mood disorders. In contrast, fMRI, through task-based and resting-state paradigms, enhances target selection precision by identifying patient-specific neural activity and functional connectivity patterns, although this approach is vulnerable to variability and imaging artifacts. Connectivity-based MRI neuronavigation represents a promising advancement by explicitly targeting disrupted neural networks. This review critically examines recent technological and methodological progress in MRI-guided neuronavigation for TMS, addressing current challenges such as image acquisition quality, co-registration accuracy, artifact mitigation, and practical constraints in clinical settings. Finally, it discusses emerging opportunities and innovations poised to enhance neuronavigation precision, foster wider clinical adoption, and ultimately improve therapeutic outcomes in interventional psychiatry for mood disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.