ArticleAmerican journal of industrial medicine2026
The Association of Current Asthma With and Without Exacerbation With Products Used and Tasks Performed by Healthcare Workers.
Article in American journal of industrial medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResults from a 2014 survey of 2030 healthcare workers (76% female, mean age 48.6 years) in New York City included the association of current asthma and asthma exacerbation with the general activities of cleaning fixed surfaces and administering aerosolized medications. We extended that analysis to determine if specific products and tasks for these and other activities were associated with the same outcomes.
methodsThe survey instrument inquired about asthma-related outcomes, products used, and tasks performed. Polytomous logistic regression was used to model a three-category outcome for current asthma without and with exacerbation and no current asthma (referent). Inverse probability weights were applied in all regression models to adjust for selection and participation bias that may have resulted from a low response of 11.1% of invitees. A separate model was fit for each exposure variable and yielded adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
resultsFor cleaning fixed surfaces, two products and eight tasks had increased odds of at least one adverse outcome. Enzymes had an OR = 3.01 (95% CI 1.50, 6.04) for current asthma with exacerbation, and bleach had an OR = 1.92 (95% CI 1.22, 3.01) for current asthma without exacerbation. The eight general cleaning tasks included three (cleanup blood/spills, wipe furniture, wipe equipment) associated with both adverse outcomes, and five tasks associated only with current asthma without exacerbation. For aerosolized medication tasks, the small-volume nebulizer was associated with current asthma with (OR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.06, 3.34) and without (OR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.01, 2.72) exacerbation, and two other tasks (continuous delivery system, metered dose inhaler) were associated only with current asthma without exacerbation.
conclusionsProducts and tasks in healthcare were associated with current asthma and asthma exacerbation. Future analyses will explore quantitative exposure-assessment strategies for specific chemicals and mixtures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.