ArticleWomen's health (London, England)
Lived experience of unsafe abortion among commercial sex workers in Gedeo Zone, Southern Ethiopia: A phenomenological qualitative study.
Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUnsafe abortion is a significant cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in low- and middle-income countries. Female sex workers in Ethiopia are exposed to unwanted and unplanned pregnancy and subsequent abortion. In the absence of access to quality abortion care services, the chances of experiencing unsafe abortion are high. However, limited evidence is available on female sex workers' experience with abortion services and their exposure to unsafe abortion.
objectiveTo explore the lived experiences of female sex workers who underwent unsafe abortion in Gedeo Zone, Southern Ethiopia.
methodsThe study was conducted among female sex workers in Gedeo Zone, Southern Ethiopia, from April to June 2024. The study was employed among female sex workers who had a history of unsafe abortion in the past 2 years. Both establishment-based and street-based female sex workers were selected using the snowball sampling method. Face-to-face in-depth interviews were conducted with participants in locations of their preference to ensure privacy. Data saturation was achieved after interviewing 18 participants. The collected data were transcribed verbatim, translated into English, and analyzed thematically using the Open Code 4.03 software. Trustworthiness was ensured throughout the data analysis process.
designA qualitative study with a phenomenological design was employed.
resultsThe findings of this study revealed that poor knowledge of safe abortion services and poor socioeconomic status are the main causes for seeking unsafe abortion services by commercial sex workers. Unsafe pregnancy terminations were mainly experienced using commercial medications from private pharmacies and using traditional practices through herbal and mechanical techniques. Sex workers resorted to traditional methods and self-induced medication abortions, leading to adverse health, psychosocial, and economic consequences.
conclusionThe study highlights the poor information literacy and limited access to abortion services for sex workers, leading to unsafe practices and subsequent physical and psychological suffering. Therefore, stakeholders should collaborate to increase female sex workers' knowledge and access to safe abortion services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.