Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41310843›Full record

ArticleBiological research2025

A recent and rapid genome expansion driven by the amplification of transposable elements in the Neotropical annual killifish Garcialebias charrua.

Felipe Gajardo-Escobar, Camilo Valdivieso, Alex Di Genova, Luisa Pereiro, Maria Jose Arezo, Gino Nardocci, Natalia Rojas, Verónica Gutiérrez, Nicolás G Papa, Nibia Berois and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Felipe Gajardo-EscobarMillennium Institute Center for Genome Regulation, Universidad de Chile, Las Palmeras 3425, Santiago, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0034-9267
Camilo ValdiviesoMillennium Institute Center for Genome Regulation, Universidad de Chile, Las Palmeras 3425, Santiago, Chile.
Alex Di GenovaMillennium Institute Center for Genome Regulation, Universidad de Chile, Las Palmeras 3425, Santiago, Chile.
Luisa PereiroMillennium Institute Center for Genome Regulation, Universidad de Chile, Las Palmeras 3425, Santiago, Chile.
Maria Jose ArezoLaboratorio de Biología Molecular de Organismos Acuáticos, Sección Biología Celular, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Gino NardocciMillennium Institute Center for Genome Regulation, Universidad de Chile, Las Palmeras 3425, Santiago, Chile.
Natalia RojasMillennium Institute Center for Genome Regulation, Universidad de Chile, Las Palmeras 3425, Santiago, Chile.
Verónica GutiérrezLaboratorio de Biología Molecular de Organismos Acuáticos, Sección Genética Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225, 11400, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Nicolás G PapaLaboratorio de Biología Molecular de Organismos Acuáticos, Sección Biología Celular, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Nibia BeroisLaboratorio de Biología Molecular de Organismos Acuáticos, Sección Biología Celular, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Alex OrellanaMillennium Institute Center for Genome Regulation, Universidad de Chile, Las Palmeras 3425, Santiago, Chile.
Rodrigo A GutiérrezMillennium Institute Center for Genome Regulation, Universidad de Chile, Las Palmeras 3425, Santiago, Chile.
Mauricio GonzálezMillennium Institute Center for Genome Regulation, Universidad de Chile, Las Palmeras 3425, Santiago, Chile.
Marco A MendezMillennium Institute Center for Genome Regulation, Universidad de Chile, Las Palmeras 3425, Santiago, Chile.
Martín MontecinoMillennium Institute Center for Genome Regulation, Universidad de Chile, Las Palmeras 3425, Santiago, Chile.
Christian HodarMillennium Institute Center for Genome Regulation, Universidad de Chile, Las Palmeras 3425, Santiago, Chile.
Alvaro GlavicMillennium Institute Center for Genome Regulation, Universidad de Chile, Las Palmeras 3425, Santiago, Chile.
Alejandro MaassMillennium Institute Center for Genome Regulation, Universidad de Chile, Las Palmeras 3425, Santiago, Chile.
Graciela GarcíaLaboratorio de Biología Molecular de Organismos Acuáticos, Sección Genética Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225, 11400, Montevideo, Uruguay. ggarcia@fcien.edu.uy.
Miguel L AllendeMillennium Institute Center for Genome Regulation, Universidad de Chile, Las Palmeras 3425, Santiago, Chile. mallende@uchile.cl.

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo ICN2021_044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeotropical annual killifish survive in seasonal ponds due to their ability to undergo embryonic diapauses in the dry season and grow, reproduce and die in the span of a few months during the rainy season. The Austrolebias genus group is endemic to the South American basins and shows remarkable speciation and genetic plasticity. Within this fish group Garcialebias charrua is sympatric with another annual killifish, Cynopoecilus melanotaenia, belonging to a tribe that diverged about 25 million years ago. Despite being closely related species within the Rivulidae family, both species show important differences in genome size. Here, we explore the genomic structure of these species to understand their evolution and unique adaptations.

resultsWe have sequenced the genomes of G. charrua and C. melanotaenia and determined that they show important structural differences between them. While C. melaotaenia has a genome size of around 1 Gb, similar to that of most characterized teleosts, G. charrua has undergone an evolutionarily recent and massive genome expansion, with a size three times larger (3 Gb). The expansion of the genome in G. charrua has occurred due to amplification of repetitive elements, most recently from the LINE class of elements. We explore and characterize in detail the contribution to genome expansion of repetitive elements at the level of superfamilies, as well as analyze the relationship between these elements and coding genes in G. charrua. We also examine the selection pressures on gene sequences and identify functions that are under positive or purifying selection, and compare these data with that derived from other species.

conclusionsOur study adds a crucial element to the understanding of annual fish evolution and life history. We show that the genetic variability and plasticity in G. charrua is accompanied by a recent genome-wide expansion with an important contribution of repetitive elements. By comparing these findings with data from other species, we show that G. charrua has undergone bursts of repetitive element expansion, with specific superfamilies of retrotransposons and DNA transposons being the most prevalent and recent. In addition, we characterize genes that are potentially implicated in adaptive traits because of their interaction with mobile elements or because they display evidence of intensified selection. These genes are candidates for functional studies aimed at unraveling the genetic basis of annualism.

Indexed as

CyprinodontiformesDNA Transposable ElementsFundulidaeGenomeAnimalsEvolution, MolecularGenome SizeDNA Transposable ElementsAnnual killifishGarcialebiasGenome expansionTransposable elements

Identifiers

PMID41310843
PMCPMC12763893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.