Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41310841›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025

Prognosis of dedifferentiated liposarcoma based on surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database.

Linna Zhu, Xianfei Duan, Liehua Deng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Linna ZhuDepartment of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Jinan University Institute of Dermatology, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China. linnazhujn@163.com.
Xianfei DuanDepartment of Dermatology, The First People's Hospital of Zhaoqing, Zhaoqing, 526000, Guangdong, China.
Liehua DengDepartment of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Jinan University Institute of Dermatology, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis research aimed to develop and validate a novel nomogram for predicting overall survival (OS) in Dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) patients.

methodsA retrospective cohort of 1,155 DDLPS cases diagnosed from 2004 to 2015 was identified through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. The prognostic model was subsequently developed by incorporating covariates independently associated with survival outcomes, as determined through multivariate analysis. To assess the model's predictive performance and clinical utility, we employed a suite of validation metrics.

resultsCox regression revealed age, tumor size, laterality, AJCC stage, combined summary stage, radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery as independent predictive variables for DDLPS. The C-index of the nomogram in the training and validation cohorts was 0.708 and 0.704, which was higher than that of the AJCC system. All AUC values、NRI (> 50%), IDI (> 10%), calibration and DCA curves showed that the new model had an excellent ability to predict OS.

conclusionsOur study represents the initial effort to develop a nomogram for predicting OS in DDLPS patients based on the SEER database. Significantly, the nomogram showed a greater potential for accurately predicting survival as opposed to the AJCC system.

Indexed as

LiposarcomaNomogramsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSEER ProgramUnited StatesDedifferentiated liposarcomaNomogramOverall survivalPrognosisSEER

Identifiers

PMID41310841
PMCPMC12751552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.