Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41310814›Full record

ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2025

Effect of transversus abdominis plane block versus intravenous hydromorphone on the quality of postoperative recovery in elderly critically Ill patients in the SICU: a single-center, single-blind, randomised controlled trial.

Jing Li, Huicong Hu, Li Zhou, Yaping Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jing LiDepartment of Zhejiang, University of Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, 310053, China.
Huicong HuDepartment of Zhejiang, University of Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, 310053, China.
Li ZhouDepartment of Zhejiang, University of Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, 310053, China.
Yaping LuDepartment of Anesthesiology, First Hospital of Jiaxing, No. 1882 Zhonghuan South Road, Nanhu District, Jiaxing, China. a1349229836@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to compare the effects of transversus abdominis plane block and hydromorphone on recovery quality in elderly critically ill patients after major abdominal surgery in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit, focusing on postoperative activity, analgesic efficacy, opioid-related side effects, hemodynamic stability, and hospital stay.

designA prospective, single-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted following CONSORT guidelines.

settingThe study took place at Jiaxing First Hospital from July 2024 to December 2025. PATIENTS: Enrolled, with 122 completing the study. Out of these 61 patients belonged to the TAP (transversus abdominis plane block) group & 61 to the control (intravenous hydromorphone) group.

interventionsThe postoperative VAS scores were assessed in patients, VAS score ≥ 4 was taken as indicative of the presence of postoperative pain. Our interventions were implemented as soon as the VAS rose to 4. Patients in the TAP group were administered ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block, while those in the control group received intravenous hydromorphone. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery-40 score at 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included QoR-40 scores at 48 h, 72 h, and 7d, VAS scores, opioid consumption, complications, and hospital stay. MAIN

resultsThe TAP group had significantly higher QoR-40 scores at 24 h (median [IQR]: 170 [167, 172] vs. 157 [153, 158], P < 0.001) and 48 h (median [IQR]162(159,165) vs 171(169,174), P < 0.001) postoperatively, along with lower VAS scores and reduced opioid consumption compared to the control group.

conclusionTAP block significantly improves recovery quality and provides better analgesia than hydromorphone in elderly critically ill patients after major abdominal surgery, reducing opioid use and enhancing postoperative outcomes. It is a safe and effective alternative for pain management in the SICU.

trial registrationThe study was registered with the China Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2400086600). Registered date: 20,240,708.

Indexed as

Abdominal surgeryCritically ill patientsHydromorphonePainPain management in intensive care unitsTransversus abdominis plane block

Identifiers

PMID41310814
PMCPMC12750943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.