ArticleCritical care (London, England)2025
Continuous non-invasive measurement of tidal volume and minute ventilation using a smart nasal cannula.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Flow Regulated Nasal Delivery System (FRNDS) is a novel smart nasal cannula platform developed to enable noninvasive, continuous monitoring of tidal volume (VT) and detection of abnormal breathing events. Combined with peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO₂) data modulation of oxygen flow can be accomplished. In a cohort of 57 adults, FRNDS-derived VT and minute ventilation were compared to reference measurements from respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) across a range of oxygen flow rates. While the cannula system tended to overestimate inspiratory and underestimate expiratory VT-especially at higher flow rates-these errors were substantially reduced by applying machine learning regression models trained on anatomical and physiological features, achieving strong agreement with RIP averaging a 53.5 mL error, 78.2 mL root-mean error, and is within ~ 11% of the actual value. The system also demonstrated robust performance in classifying clinically relevant breathing patterns, including apneic spells and mouth breathing, suggesting utility for real-time respiratory surveillance and sleep apnea detection. These results support FRNDS as a promising, adaptable solution for individualized respiratory monitoring in both clinical and home environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.