ReviewJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025
Collaborative AI for precision neurorehabilitation: a roadmap.
Review in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Berlin bimanual test for stroke survivors (BeBiT-S): evaluating exoskeleton-assisted bimanual motor function after stroke.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Trial
- Advancing human sensorimotor research through modular robotics: the case of the HRX-1.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026Review
- The Digital Transformation of Rehabilitation Medicine: A Narrative Review of Artificial Intelligence Innovations, Clinical Integration, and Future Paradigms.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Review
- Network-oriented neurorehabilitation after stroke: a paradigmatic approach.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Review
- To learn or not to learn? Model-based estimation of motor learning in a large, "in the wild", home rehabilitation database.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Neurorehabilitation needs a qualitative perspective: a case exemplar from stroke recovery and rehabilitation.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Development and internal validation of an artificial intelligence-driven precision rehabilitation model for ischemic stroke: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A structural causal model for robot-assisted upper-limb neurorehabilitation.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Precision rehabilitation seeks to improve care for individuals by identifying personalized treatments that enhance both the efficacy and efficiency of care. Rapid advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and data-driven methodologies stand to greatly enhance precision rehabilitation methods, particularly when paired with clinical expertise and patient-driven goals. Although AI has been successfully integrated into healthcare in fields such as precision oncology, the dynamic, multi-faceted, complex nature of rehabilitation require a different approach than standard predictive models. Here, we argue that precision rehabilitation may benefit from collaborative AI, in which humans and AI work together with AI distilling complex data that humans can use as part of their nuanced decision-making process. We review the current landscape of precision rehabilitation and explore how collaborative AI, and AI in general, can advance the field. We begin by outlining a roadmap for a general collaborative AI system in rehabilitation, noting four key challenges that must be addressed. Next, we examine three existing precision rehabilitation frameworks that have been developed independently by several of the co-authors, which share four common key elements of the roadmap. We then describe examples of how AI has already been applied to specific aspects of complex rehabilitation scenarios, as these may be integrated into larger collaborative AI models. We follow this with a discussion of how to make AI-based precision rehabilitation a reality, with an emphasis on the large data required for these models to make accurate predictions, as well as potential ethical issues. Finally, we conclude with recommendations for future directions. Ultimately, collaborative AI promises to transform rehabilitation by leveraging vast, diverse datasets to create individualized digital profiles, which can first be used to simulate the effects of rehabilitation interventions in silico, maximizing impacts before real-world implementation. By merging personalized rehabilitation strategies based on empirical evidence with the depth and complexity of clinical knowledge and reasoning, collaborative AI holds promise as a powerful tool to help clinicians advance patient care and improve long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.