ArticleBMC health services research2025
Pediatric oncology healthcare professionals' attitudes to and awareness of regulations for minors' and guardians' online record access: a mixed-methods study in Sweden.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare providers and policymakers worldwide differ in their provision of access to adolescent patients' electronic health records (EHR). The regulatory framework in Sweden restricting both guardians' and adolescents' online record access (ORA) has during recent years received criticism. The aim was to quantitatively and qualitatively, explore attitudes about ORA and perceptions about ORA regulations among pediatric oncology healthcare professionals (HCPs) in Sweden.
methodsA convergent mixed-methods design (QUAL, quan) was used, consisting of a survey study (N = 95) and semi-structured individual interviews (N = 13). Physicians and nurses in pediatric oncology were recruited in clinics face-to-face or via staff e-mail. Descriptive statistics were used to present quantitative survey results. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using content analysis.
resultsA majority of participants (72%) were critical of the access restrictions but lacked knowledge about access extensions, with more than 60% unaware of application procedures. Five themes emerged regarding both perceived benefits and risks of ORA. Examples of benefits included adolescent empowerment, parental support, and improved partnership; risks included an increased emotional distress and confusion among young patients and their guardians, increased workload for HCPs, and threats to adolescent confidentiality. An additional five identified themes captured HCPs' views on regulations and included uncertainty, variation among adolescents, and the need to balance parental support and adolescent privacy.
conclusionsFindings indicate lacking knowledge about ORA regulations and little incentive for HCPs to promote its use. While risks of ORA were often directly experienced and concerned confidentiality breaches and difficulties with EHR documentation, benefits tended to be anticipatory and related to patient or parent experiences. Still, HCPs showed limited support for ORA restrictions during adolescence. To ensure safe and effective ORA use, HCPs need clearer guidance and support.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.